H R Hancock - meaning and definition. What is H R Hancock
Diclib.com
ChatGPT AI Dictionary
Enter a word or phrase in any language 👆
Language:

Translation and analysis of words by ChatGPT artificial intelligence

On this page you can get a detailed analysis of a word or phrase, produced by the best artificial intelligence technology to date:

  • how the word is used
  • frequency of use
  • it is used more often in oral or written speech
  • word translation options
  • usage examples (several phrases with translation)
  • etymology

What (who) is H R Hancock - definition

BRITISH CASE LAW
R v Hancock and Shankland

H. R. Hancock         
(1836-1919) MINE SUPERINTENDENT
Captain Hancock; Henry Richard Hancock; Hancock jig
Henry Richard Hancock (1 April 1836 – 14 January 1919) almost invariably referred to as "Captain Hancock""Captain" was a title traditionally bestowed by (esp. Cornish) miners on their supervisor.
John Hancock (venereologist)         
  • Group photo of London Medical students who went to Belsen
BRITISH VENEREOLOGIST
John Arthur Harland Hancock; John Arthur Hancock
John Arthur Harland Hancock (1923 – 7 June 1974) was a British venereologist and editor of the British Journal of Venereal Diseases who wrote on non-gonococcal urethritis and reactive arthritis, what was known as Reiter's disease at the time. In 1945, while studying medicine at the London Hospital, he was one of the voluntary students sent to Belsen to assist nutritionist Arnold Peter Meiklejohn in feeding the starving inmates. There, he became unwell with typhus and was treated back at The London by Lord Evans.
H. Irving Hancock         
AMERICAN JOURNALIST
Harrie Irving Hancock; Li Shoon; Irving Hancock
Harrie Irving Hancock (January 16, 1868 – March 12, 1922) was an American chemist and writer, mainly remembered as an author of children's literature and juveniles in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and as having written a fictional depiction of a German invasion of the United States.

Wikipedia

R v Hancock

R v Hancock [1985] UKHL 9 is an English legal decision of the highest court setting out the relationship between foresight of consequences and intention in cases of murder. It refers to the case of the killing of David Wilkie. The defendants' stated intention had been to frighten a person, but another was killed. The law, as the judgement of the whole court (a per curiam decision) was held to hinge on the relationship between foresight of the range of results of taking a particular action and the result of that action which must include a specific direction or legal mention of considering the probability of death or serious injury resulting, and other directions which explain the difference between the offence of manslaughter and that of murder.